Different Approaches to Design Management - comparative study among Swedish and Polish furniture companies

  • Justyna Starostka Kozminski University, Department of Management, Warszaw, Poland


There are many roles that design can play in organisations. It can be source of good marketing strategy, and designer by himself can be a promotional tool for a company. Thanks to those actions companies can gain publicity, media attention and good PR.

On the second level, design can be perceived as ‘process of making things better’. In this case companies can achieve more effective product development process, new tools and technologies.

On the third level we have the situation when designer work alongside with company managers with the whole business concept. At this level, designers’ work looks more like a brand consultant, a strategist. In this approach design should be reflecting certain brand name and brand values.

As our study presented, Swedish companies operate on those two, higher levels, while Polish still limit the scope of design. We strongly believe, that Polish companies, as they gain more experience with design activities, will be more likely to perceive design in this more mature approach. In the meantime, presenting best practices from companies from other, more mature countries could be a good way of promoting design as a strategic asset rather than promotional tool. We believe that in order to fasten this process, Polish companies should as follows:

1. Work more often with external and foreign designers;

2. Expand the area of designer responsibilities in companies;

3. Place the responsibility for design in hands of professional design managers.


Download data is not yet available.


Borja de Mozota, B. (2003) Design Management: Using Design to Build Brand Value and Corporate Innovation, Allworth Press, Canada

Bruce, M. & Daly, L. (2007) Design And Marketing Connections, Journal Of Marketing Management, vol. 23, no. 9–10

Bruce, M. & Bessant, J. R. (2002) Design in Business: Strategic Innovation Through Design, Harlow, London and New York, Financial Times/Prentice Hall

Cross, N. (1993) Science And Design Methodology: A Review, Research in Engineering Design, vol. 5, no. 2

Dell’Era, C. & Verganti, R. (2010) Collaborative Strategies in Design-intensive Industries, Long Range Planning, vol. 43 no 1

Dell’Era, C., Marchesi, A. &Verganti, R. (2008) Linguistic Network Configurations: Management of Innovation in Design-Intensive Firms,International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 12, no. 1

Dreyfuss, H. (1967)Designing for People, Paragraphic Books, New York

Nielsen, T. (2004) Svenska Företag Om Design – Attityder, Lönsamhet Och Designmognad, Stiftelsen Svensk Industridesign, Stockholm

Nielsen, T. (2008), Svenska företag om design, Stiftelsen Svensk Industridesign, Stockholm

Norman, D. (2004) Emotional Design. Why we love (or hate) everyday things, Basics Books, New York

Perks, H., Cooper, R. & Jones, C. (2005) Characterizing the role of design in New Product Development: An Empirically Derived Taxonomy, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 22 issue 2

Sun, Q., Williams, A., Evans, M. (2011) A Theoretical Design Management Framework, The Design Journal, vol. 14, issue 1

Ulrich, K. & Eppinger, S. D. (2000) Product design and development, The McGraw/Hill Companies, Boston

Verganti, R. (2006) Innovating Through Design, Harvard Business Review, vol. 84 issue 12

Verganti, R. (2008) Design, Meanings, and Radical Innovation: A Metamodel and a Research Agenda, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 25, issue 5

Whyte, J. K. Salter, AJ & Gann, D. M. (2003) Designing to Compete: Lessons from Millennium Product Winners, Design Studies, vol. 24, no. 5

How to Cite
Starostka, J. (2016) “Different Approaches to Design Management - comparative study among Swedish and Polish furniture companies”, Swedish Design Research Journal, 8(2), pp. 46-52. doi: 10.3384/svid.2000-964X.12246.
Research articles